![avid media composer vs adobe premiere pro avid media composer vs adobe premiere pro](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uuElgfInFvw/sddefault.jpg)
In the newly created Production any number of projects can be created.
#Avid media composer vs adobe premiere pro pro#
On the Premiere Pro starting screen instead of creating a project, simply navigate to File / New / Production then simply name the Production and choose a location on the shared storage. A Production can be seen as a container for multiple projects and it is very straightforward to set up and use. This is an entirely new concept and it is available to all users in Premiere Pro 14.1. On the 14 th of April 2020 Adobe made a big announcement about the introduction of Premiere Pro Productions. The third and most recent addition to Premiere Pro’s project sharing capabilities is called Premiere Pro Production, which offers a similar experience to Avid Media Composer. This was a considerable improvement to their project sharing capabilities but it still wasn’t as simple and easy to use as the approach implemented by Avid. Additionally, opening multiple projects at once was also made possible. This function, when enabled, allows automatic project locking. With the release of Creative Cloud 2018, Adobe has offered another feature – one called Shared Projects. First through the introduction of Team Projects – a cloud-based project sharing solution available to Creative Cloud for enterprise (CCE) and Creative Cloud for teams (CCT) licensed users. The first user to open any bin in the project gets granted a write access whilst other users can open the bin in a read-only mode.Īware of the benefits that project sharing brings, Adobe have been seeking new ways to implement this functionality through multiple approaches in the most recent versions. Whilst using Media Composer with purpose-built shared storage such as Avids own Nexis or any ELEMENTS system, the project sharing function allows multiple users to work on a single project. The biggest benefit of Media Composer has for a number of years been its project sharing capabilities. This approach allows the user to maintain structure and to keep control over the media files, even on long running projects. Though more complicated at the beginning, having consistent media files simplifies the workflow and provides a stable environment for Media Composer to operate in. The recommended workflow requires the creation of the so-called Avid MediaFiles – copies of the imported footage. Whilst working directly with the original footage is possible, it comes with considerable cost to application performance. Avid Media Composer on the other hand takes an entirely different approach. This workflow makes Premiere Pro very flexible and of benefit to fast-pace editing projects. This is possible due to the fact that Premiere Pro upon import creates supporting files to allow editing directly with the original footage.
![avid media composer vs adobe premiere pro avid media composer vs adobe premiere pro](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5zgdYW6rh3o/maxresdefault.jpg)
Premiere Pro for instance works seamlessly with various types of footage. These two programs, though generally similar in function, provide very different workflow benefits (or disadvantages) depending on the perspective. Since then, I have been using both of these NLEs for different projects, however, choosing a tool per project is not always possible in a large post production environment. Media Composer was my first choice for quite some time, until I realised that both applications are different tools that can be utilised in many different ways. The video production community has for a number of years been split between those who favour Avid Media Composer and those who favour Adobe Premiere Pro for use in their editing workflows.